dorsal column stimulator for shingles pain

#Dorsal column stimulator for shingles pain trial

The specific resistance of biological material-A compendium of data for the biomedical engineer and physiologist. Epidural spinal cord stimulation: calculation of field potentials with special reference to dorsal column nerve fibers. A quantitative description of membrane currents and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve. Neuropathic extremity pain and spinal cord stimulation. Electrical stimulation of excitable tissue: design of efficacious and safe protocols. Morphometry of the human superficial dorsal and dorsolateral column fibers: significance to spinal cord stimulation. 2002 51:381–9.įeirabend HKP, Choufoer H, Ploeger S, Holsheimer J, Van Gool JD.

#Dorsal column stimulator for shingles pain trial

Spinal cord stimulation electrode design: prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing percutaneous and laminectomy electrodes. Stimulation usage range for chronic pain management. Which neuronal elements are activated directly by spinal cord stimulation. Optimum electrode geometry for spinal cord stimulation: the narrow bipole and tripole. Anodal excitation of intact peripheral nerves in humans. Anodal block: can this occur during routine nerve conduction studies? Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol. Acute animal studies on the use of an anodal block to reduce urethral resistance in sacral root stimulation. Rijkhoff NJM, Koldewijn EL, Van Kerrebroeck PEV, Debbruyne FMJ, Wijkstra H. A quantitative study of electrical stimulation of the myelinated fibers with monopolar electrodes. Which elements are excited in electrical stimulation of mammalian central nervous system: a review. Analysis of models for external stimulation of axons. Analysis of a model for excitation of myelinated nerve. The predictive value of sympathetic block for the success of spinal cord stimulation. Hord ED, Cohen SP, Cosgrove GR, Ahmed SU, Vallejo R, Chang Y, et al. This study provides evidence for the value of brushed evoked potentials in predicting outcome of SCS treatment in CRPS- 1. Brushed-evoked allodynia predicts outcome of spinal cord stimulation in complex regional pain syndrome type 1. van Eijs F, Smits H, Geurts JW, Kessels AG, Kemler MA, van Kleef M, et al.This multicenter retrospective analysis provides insight into the factors associated with the outcome of the trial of the SCS. A multi-center analysis evaluating factors associated with spinal cord stimulation outcome in chronic pain patients. Williams KA, Gonzalez-Fernandez M, Hamzehzadeh S, Wilkinson I, Erdek MA, Plunkett A, et al.The authors also sought to evaluate the predictive values of pre- operative clinical sensory testing. This is the first pilot study confirming the efficacy of SCS in the treatment of intractable painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Pain relief and quality-of-life improvement after spinal cord stimulation in painful diabetic polyneuropathy: a pilot study.

Pluijms WA, Slangen R, Bakkers M, Faber CG, Merkies IS, Kessels AG, et al.

Spinal cord stimulation vs conventional medical management for neuropathic pain: a multicenter randomized controlled trial in patients with failed back surgery syndrome.

Kumar K, Taylor RS, Jacques L, Eldabe S, Meglio M, Molet J, et al. This is the first multi- center randomized control trial of SCS and re- operation and provides evidence for the value of SCS in the treatment of failed back surgery syndrome. Spinal cord stimulation vs re-operation in patients with failed back surgery syndrome: an international multicenter randomized controlled trial (EVIDENCE study). North RB, Kumar K, Wallace MS, Henderson JM, Shipley J, Hernandez J, et al.

Electrical inhibition of pain by stimulation of the dorsal columns: preliminary clinical report. The part played by electric fish in the early history of bioelectricity and electrotherapy. Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: